Thursday, August 28, 2014

5 Things Prospect Capital Corporation's Management Wants You to Know

Tough questions followed Prospect Capital  (NASDAQ: PSEC  ) into Monday's conference call after the business development company reported disappointing fourth-quarter earnings.

Here are some of the most important takeaways from the call.

1. This quarter's results could be equally poor

It may seem too soon to think about earnings for the current quarter, which ends just a little over one month from today. But it seems like the quarter will be difficult, too.

On the conference call, President and COO Grier Eliasek said new investments were running lower than normal: "We have booked $239.1 million in originations so far in the current September quarter. Net of $322.3 million of repayments, our net repayment so far this quarter is $83.2 million."

Fewer originations underlied lackluster performance in the fourth quarter. Lower originations mean lower origination- and structuring-fee income, which were a vital portion of Prospect's historical earnings sources.

In the fourth quarter, Prospect Capital missed earnings expectations on $444 million in new investments. This quarter, Prospect Capital is on track to complete even fewer deals.

2. The company wants out of lower-yielding assets

Prospect Capital shares currently yield a little over 12%. Naturally, the low-yielding assets on its balance sheet are doing very little to support that dividend yield.

According to Eliasek, "We have some first-lien, senior secured assets yielding in the range of 6% to 7% which acts as an overall drag on our weighted-average yield and we are looking to potentially exit those while retaining administrative control and stewardship of the same credits."

Later, he provided some more detail into how Prospect would seek to shift these assets off the balance sheet: "We would actually do so in a way so that our assets would be primarily qualifying at least as one of the key strategies we're looking at."

What does this mean for shareholders? First, selling loans yielding 6%-7% to buy double-digit-yielding assets would clearly help support the current dividend. Selling them in a way that allows Prospect Capital Corporation to collect a management fee on the assets would be even better. This is nothing new; it's been the company's plan for two quarters.

Alas, Eliasek's second comment about making sure the assets are qualifying rules out a senior secured lending program -- a strategy employed by competitors including Golub Capital  (NASDAQ: GBDC  ) and Ares Capital  (NASDAQ: ARCC  ) .

Admittedly, I'm perplexed as to how Prospect Capital plans on managing these assets in a way that makes them qualifying assets for a business development company structure. At any rate, it's certain that rotating out of lower-yielding investments to higher-yielding investments should help ongoing net investment income.

3. The dividend is at risk

Prospect Capital earned less than it paid out in dividends in every quarter of 2014. Now, with spillover income (retained earnings) in decline, the company will either need to start earning its dividend, cut its dividend, or maintain its dividend by making return of capital distributions.

When asked if Prospect Capital would maintain the dividend, even if it meant returning capital to shareholders, Eliasek explained the company's viewpoint: "Our policy strategy is to focus on paying out dividends out of taxable earnings and to avoid return of capital distributions over the long term, and we do have a spillback available to us to support that. But we also have catalysts which we hope will drive our earnings going forward."

Catalysts mentioned were rotating out of lower-yielding investments, reducing Prospect Capital's borrowing costs, and selling non-income-producing control investments to buy yielding assets.

Analysts further peppered management with questions about the sustainability of the dividend, but the answer remained that Prospect Capital would address dividends at a later time.

4. New at-the-market stock sales appear unlikely

Growing the balance sheet by selling new shares to the public has been one of Prospect Capital's most important sources for driving income. New stock sales mean more capital, which brings new investments, along with their accompanying origination and structuring fees.

When asked if there was any time frame for initiating at-the-market stock sales, Grier Eliasek answered plainly that, "No, we haven't made any final determinations yet on that ... and it will be against an opportunity set that we see in the market."

5. Dividend income might displace interest income

The annual earnings report revealed that Prospect Capital lowered interest rates on loans made to its control companies. This would obviously result in lower interest income, but Eliasek noted that it could be offset by larger dividends.

"[L]est you think that some others going to be a -- some downtick in income from those companies," he said, "remember these are companies where we own a significant portion of the equity as well and have the ability to take recurring distributions and do so for many of those."

The message here is that what is lost in interest income might flow through as dividend income. This will be something to watch carefully in future quarters. 

All in all, it was an interesting, if perplexing, conference call. On one hand, Prospect Capital has paid the largest dividend of any BDC for quite some time. On the other, it seems as though the yield may come into question in January 2015 -- the next month for which the company hasn't yet declared a dividend.

Top dividend stocks with yields that grow over time
The smartest investors know that dividend stocks simply crush their nondividend-paying counterparts over the long term. That's beyond dispute. They also know that a well-constructed dividend portfolio creates wealth steadily, while still allowing you to sleep like a baby. Knowing how valuable such a portfolio might be, our top analysts put together a report on a group of high-yielding stocks that should be in any income investor's portfolio. To see our free report on these stocks, just click here now.

Wednesday, August 27, 2014

S&P 500 Closes at Record High, Cracks 2000: What’s Next?

S&P Dow Jones Indices’ Howard Silverblatt can finally crack open that bottle of champagne.

REUTERS

The S&P 500 rose 0.1% to 2,000.02, a new record and the first time the index closed above 2,000. The Dow Jones Industrial Average advanced 0.2% to 17,106.70, its third-highest close ever, while the Nasdaq Composite gained 0.3% to 4,570.64. The small-company Russell 2000 jumped 0.9% to 1,175.17.

The stock market gained despite the release of mixed economic data released today. On a seasonally adjusted basis, the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index fell 0.1% in June from May, although they rose 0.9% on an unadjusted basis, while durable goods orders jumped 23% in July, though strip out airplanes and orders fell 0.8%. US consumer confidence rose to 92.4 in August, besting forecasts for a reading of 88.5. Interactive Brokers’ Andrew Wilkinson considers the mixed messages:

Generally speaking, consumers indicated that they were more confident about the economy at the present time. As a result the Conference Board's headline reading of confidence rose to 92.4 reaching its highest reading since October 2007. While the mindset among consumers is buoyant surrounding the present situation, they shied away when asked about their future positions. As a result the expectations index took a step back to 90.9 (-1.0). Fewer consumers planned to buy major appliances in the next six months. Meanwhile, more people indicated that they planned to buy a "new" home over the coming period. Fewer people planned to buy "used" homes. The mix here is important as the existing homes market comprises about 95% of the overall housing market. Corroborating the earlier durable goods report, consumer confidence data points show that progress continues to face challenges as the recovery becomes entrenched.

Chelsea Global Advisors’ Edward Talisse wonders if investors are being properly compensated for holding stocks:

The S&P 500 is neither overvalued nor undervalued at its current price. The price simply reflects consensus expectations about forward earnings and dividends growth, multiples, interest rates and a fair required rate of return. All these variables are either directly observable or have easy to use empirical based models for parameter estimation. Investors can and should evaluate their expectations against others and market implied realities. Consensus expectations and your own can be too high or too low. They can be overly optimistic or unduly pessimistic- but the price of the S&P 500 is right.

If you think that the expectation of 7% risk-adjusted return is reasonable to bear equity risk, then you should be comfortable with the current valuation. However, the valuation appears stretched unless you trust that the dividend yield or growth rate of dividends will increase, or you are willing to lower your required rate of return…

Capital Economics’ John Higgins thinks the S&P 500 finishes the year at 2,000.

Although the S&P 500 has broken above 2,000 this week for the first time, we doubt that the stock market will go from strength to strength. For now, we are sticking with our forecast that the index will end next year roughly where it is now…

…no recent tightening cycle has featured large-scale asset purchases by the Fed, which are due to be phased out soon. These have given equity prices a big boost in recent years via portfolio rebalancing. As a result, the valuation of the S&P 500 is now more stretched than it was when the Fed first raised rates in six of the last seven major tightening cycles. The exception was in 1999/2000, when tighter policy was soon followed by the bursting of the dot com bubble. Granted, the valuation of the stock market is nowhere near as high as it was then. But it is hard to make the case that equities are attractively valued today in their own right.

Right now, however, that hardly seems to matter.

Thursday, August 21, 2014

Buy a Designer Handbag Now (but Sell the Designer Bag Maker)

Kate Spade New York - Presentation - Mercedes-Benz Fashion Week Fall 2014 Cindy Ord/Getty Images It may be back-to-school shopping season, but this doesn't mean that moms -- or other well-to-do fashionistas -- can't snap up a seasonal bargain. There may never be a better time to buy designer totes, satchels or shoulder bags. This is the time of year when Coach (COH), Michael Kors (KORS) and Kate Spade (KATE) usually discount some of their dated product lines ahead of new fall arrivals. But the markdowns may be even juicier this summer. Gross margins are contracting, and inventory is starting to build up. This is bad news for handbag makers and investors, but it should be good news for folks looking to buy a luxury purse. Let's Fly Coach Coach is the largest of the three luxury handbag makers, but that's about to change. After yielding market share to Michael Kors and to a lesser extent Kate Spade in recent years, analysts see Michael Kors overtaking Coach this upcoming holiday shopping season. Coach isn't doing very well. Sales and adjusted earnings are fell 7 percent and 35 percent, respectively, in its latest quarter. However, investors were braced for an even sloppier showing. Strong international sales, particularly in China, helped offset some but clearly not all of the domestic shortfalls (Coach suffered a 16 percent decline in North American sales). Coach was the only one of the three publicly traded luxury handbag makers to see its stock climb the trading day after announcing results. The other two are growing, but there are problematic signs for investors across all three players. Calling a Spade a Spade Kate Spade is the smallest of the three, and it was the last of the three to report. After unloading its Juicy Couture apparel and Lucky Brand premium denim lines, Kate Spade has been able to focus on its booming premium handbag and accessories business. Kate Spade's sales soared 49 percent in its latest quarter, and it was able to turn a year-ago deficit into an adjusted profit this time around. The stock still took a 25 percent hit on the news as Kate Spade scared the market with weak gross margins. Kate Spade blames the contraction on having to discount the Kate Spade Saturday brand. Investors dumped the stock despite Kate Spade boosting some of its outlook metrics for all of 2014. Crash Kors Michael Kors reported after Coach but before Kate Spade. It experienced a 43 percent spike in sales, and earnings climbed 50 percent. The stock still moved lower on the news. Kors disappointed investors by warning that margins will contract in the current quarter. It also posted a 65 percent increase in inventory. Seasoned investors know that it's not a good sign when inventory is growing faster than sales. It usually suggests that the company has more unsold merchandise around, and that's often a precursor to margin-gnawing clearance sales. The markdowns are already happening. Kate Spade, Michael Kors and Coach all posted lower gross margins this time around than they did last year. We can't blame this on seasonal blips since we're comparing one early summer quarter to the same period the year before. Making things even more interesting is that Coach hired a creative executive late last year. This may indicate that Coach will be in more of a discounting mood than usual as it emphasizes new handbag lines. Either way, the message is clear: Go out and get a great deal on a designer handbag now, but wait until the rubble settles before buying the actual premium handbag designers. More from Rick Aristotle Munarriz
•How to Turn Shrinking Home Theaters Into Growing Portfolios •What's Going Wrong With Office Supply Superstores? •What Company Will Coca-Cola Drink Up Next?

Wednesday, August 20, 2014

4 Stocks Under $10 Making Big Moves Higher

DELAFIELD, Wis. (Stockpickr) -- At Stockpickr, we track daily portfolios of stocks that are the biggest percentage gainers and the biggest percentage losers.

>>Warren Buffett's Top 25 Stocks for 2014

Stocks that are making large moves like these are favorites among short-term traders because they can jump into these names and try to capture some of that massive volatility. Stocks that are making big-percentage moves either up or down are usually in play because their sector is becoming attractive or they have a major fundamental catalyst such as a recent earnings release. Sometimes stocks making big moves have been hit with an analyst upgrade or an analyst downgrade.

Regardless of the reason behind it, when a stock makes a large-percentage move, it is often just the start of a new major trend -- a trend that can lead to huge profits. If you time your trade correctly, combining technical indicators with fundamental trends, discipline and sound money management, you will be well on your way to investment success.

>>5 Rocket Stocks to Buy for Blastoff Earnings Season Gains

With that in mind, let's take a closer look at a several stocks under $10 that are making large moves to the upside.

Endeavour International

Endeavour International (END), an independent oil and gas company, acquires, explores and develops energy reserves and resources in the United Kingdom North Sea and the U. S. onshore. This stock closed up 6.8% to $1.40 in Tuesday's trading session.

Tuesday's Range: $1.31-$1.46

52-Week Range: $1.02-$7.50

Tuesday's Volume: 2.82 million

Three-Month Average Volume: 1.79 million

From a technical perspective, END ripped sharply higher here with strong upside volume flows. This sharp move to the upside on Tuesday is quickly pushing shares of END within range of triggering a major breakout trade. That trade will hit if END manages to take out some near-term overhead resistance levels at $1.46 to $1.52 and then once it clears its 50-day moving average of $1.59 with high volume.

Traders should now look for long-biased trades in END as long as it's trending above Tuesday's intraday low of $1.31 or above more key support at $1.20 and then once it sustains a move or close above those breakout levels with volume that hits near or above 1.79 million shares. If that breakout gets underway soon, then END will set up to re-test or possibly take out its next major overhead resistance levels at $1.80 to $1.95.

Higher One

Higher One (ONE) provides technology-based refund disbursement, payment processing and data analytics services to higher education institutions and students in the U.S. This stock closed up 6.8% to $4.35 in Tuesday's trading session.

Tuesday's Range: $4.05-$4.39

52-Week Range: $3.47-$11.06

Tuesday's Volume: 498,000

Three-Month Average Volume: 440,559

From a technical perspective, ONE ripped sharply higher here right above its 50-day moving average of $3.95 with above-average volume. This strong move to the upside on Tuesday is quickly pushing shares of ONE within range of triggering a major breakout trade. That trade will hit if ONE manages to take out Tuesday's intraday high of $4.39 to some more key overhead resistance at $4.52 with high volume.

Traders should now look for long-biased trades in ONE as long as it's trending above its 50-day at $3.95 or above some more key support at $3.88 and then once it sustains a move or close above those breakout levels with volume that hits near or above 440,559 shares. If that breakout hits soon, then ONE will set up to re-test or possibly take out its next major overhead resistance levels at $5 to $5.50, or even $6 to $6.50.

Yingli Green Energy

Yingli Green Energy (YGE), together with its subsidiaries, designs, develops, manufacture, markets, sells and installs photovoltaic products in the People's Republic of China. This stock closed up 4.5% to $3.45 Tuesday's trading session.

Tuesday's Range: $3.30-$3.55

52-Week Range: $2.68-$8.77

Tuesday's Volume: 3.88 million

Three-Month Average Volume: 5.34 million

From a technical perspective, YGE jumped notably higher here right off its 50-day moving average of $3.32 with lighter-than-average volume. This stock recently formed a double bottom chart pattern at $3.08 to $3.16. Following that bottom, shares of YGE have started to uptrend back above its 50-day and it's quickly moving within range of triggering a big breakout trade above a key downtrend line. That trade will hit if YGE manages to take out Tuesday's intraday high of $3.55 to some more key overhead resistance at $3.60 with high volume.

Traders should now look for long-biased trades in YGE as long as it's trending above Tuesday's intraday low of $3.30 or above those double bottom support zones and then once it sustains a move or close above those breakout levels with volume that hits near or above 5.34 million shares. If that breakout kicks off soon, then YGE will set up to re-test or possibly take out its next major overhead resistance levels at $3.85 to $4.04. Any high-volume move above those levels will then give YGE a chance to tag its next major overhead resistance levels at $4.65 to $4.88.

China Finance Online

China Finance Online (JRJC) provides integrated financial information and services in the People's Republic of China and Hong Kong. This stock closed up 6.7% to $4.27 in Tuesday's trading session.

Tuesday's Range: $3.96-$4.32

52-Week Range: $1.25-$8.20

Tuesday's Volume: 447,000

Three-Month Average Volume: 471,952

From a technical perspective, JRJC bounced sharply higher here right above some near-term support levels at $3.83 and its 50-day moving average at $3.77 with decent upside volume flows. This bounce higher on Tuesday is quickly pushing shares of JRJC within range of triggering a major breakout trade. That trade will hit if JRJC manages to take out some key near-term overhead resistance levels at $4.45 to its 200-day moving average at $4.53 with high volume.

Traders should now look for long-biased trades in JRJC as long as it's trending above Tuesday's intraday low of $3.96 or above its 50-day at $3.77 and then once it sustains a move or close above those breakout levels with volume that hits near or above 471,952 hares. If that breakout triggers soon, then JRJC will set up to re-test or possibly take out its next major overhead resistance levels at $5.10 to $6.40.

To see more stocks that are making notable moves higher, check out the Stocks Under $10 Moving Higher portfolio on Stockpickr.

-- Written by Roberto Pedone in Delafield, Wis.


RELATED LINKS:



>>3 Stocks Rising on Big Volume



>>5 Stocks Ready for Breakouts



>>5 Dividend Stocks Set to Pay You More

Follow Stockpickr on Twitter and become a fan on Facebook.

At the time of publication, author had no positions in stocks mentioned.

Roberto Pedone, based out of Delafield, Wis., is an independent trader who focuses on technical analysis for small- and large-cap stocks, options, futures, commodities and currencies. Roberto studied international business at the Milwaukee School of Engineering, and he spent a year overseas studying business in Lubeck, Germany. His work has appeared on financial outlets including

CNBC.com and Forbes.com.

You can follow Pedone on Twitter at www.twitter.com/zerosum24 or @zerosum24.


Sunday, August 10, 2014

Credit Outlook Worsens For Chinese State Banks

The credit portfolios of the big four Chinese state banks are worsening thanks to a weaker housing market, and now the major lenders are getting serious about the non-performing loans on their books.

The Bank of Communications Bank of Communications, China's fifth-largest bank, assembled research teams last month to look over the assets of troubled borrowers in Zhejiang Province, according to bank sources and an internal document obtained by Reuters. The province is a hotbed of China's credit stress, the Shanghai Daily reported on Sunday.

China's big state owned banks have been blamed by investors for misrepresenting the actual amount of bad loans.  Official record puts China's non-performers on par with world averages.  But many investors, primarily those with a more bearish outlook, think the government banks have a major problem on their hands.  Not only is the housing market shrinking, but the People's Bank of China Bank of China (PBoC) is also breathing down the necks of lenders who manage non-diversified trust funds. The government is aware of the credit problem and is doing its best to keep up appearances, at least.

One of the more famous trust fund duds was China Credit Equals Gold #1, which basically invested in a single company that had no revenues. The fund went belly up. It was connected to the world's largest bank, China's Industrial and Commercial Bank.

The Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, the country's largest bank, has run into major problems with asset management products. Now the big banks are trying to protect themselves from a rise in non-performing loans.

The Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, the country's largest bank, has run into major problems with asset management products. Now the big banks are trying to protect themselves from a rise in non-performing loans. As they rise, China's government is likely to sweep them under the rug as it did over 10 years ago.

Bankers from other major lenders said they were further cutting lending to riskier borrowers, in particular smaller private companies. The PBoC has been pushing for banks to lend to small businesses.

"We're lending almost exclusively to state-owned enterprises in our department at the moment, because it's just seen as the least risky," a senior loan officer at the Bank of China was quoted saying in Sunday's Shanghai Daily.

Management at the Bank of Communications had grown increasingly concerned about a surge in bad loans in July. In response, it set up teams to assess the situation in Zhejiang, Shandong, Fujian, Hubei and Guangdong provinces, according to Reuters.

China's official information on non-performing loans (NPLs) first became available in 1998, but the data from 1998 and 1999 probably under-estimated the actual size of the NPL problem, the National Bureau of Economic Research in Cambridge, Mass. said in a white paper dated February 2012. China's low-balling would explain the jump in the size of NPLs from 1999 to 2000. China's NPLs are the highest out of six countries, including the U.S., from 2000 to 2007. By 2010, the total value of NPLs fell by half to $68.1 billion, for a low 1.1%. Only Indonesia and Taiwan had better credit portfolios.

But since then, investors are back to doubting the numbers.

Official figures on outstanding loans in China never include the bad loans that have been transferred from banks to four state-owned asset management companies —basically China's toxic asset relief program. Those loans are still on the books, being rolled over year after year, unlikely ever to be paid in full.

The National Bureau of Economic Research said if China's actual NPLs were added to the toxic asset funds run by the big four, then "the total amount of non-performing loans would increase by two-thirds."

There's also a classification problem.

The Basel Committee for Bank Supervision classifies a loan as a non-performer when any interest payment is overdue by 180 days or more. In the U.S., non-performing loans are those overdue by 90 days.

But China plays by different rules. Classification of a non-performing loan is typically taken only when the principal payment is delayed beyond the loan maturity date or an extended due date. It's not just a matter of semantics. For investors, the credit bubble has become a matter of buy or sell Chinese stocks.

The good news is that China has been here before. And survived.

In the later 1990s and early 2000s, non-performing loans at state banks were estimated by Moody's Moody's to be as high as 45%.  Everybody thought China banks would soon fail. However, monetary authorities came to the rescue. They simply wrote-off half of that debt without batting an eye, while the other half were taken off balance sheet and sold to newly created government-funded asset management companies at par value. Instead of suffering a Japan-style financial crisis, the economy entered a decade-long period of extraordinary high growth. And the loans, like the bad loans of today, were never paid off.

"China has a war chest of foreign exchange reserves that it finds difficult to dispense," wrote Yu Yongding, former president of the China Society of World Economics, in an op-ed published by Hong Kong based NGO, the China U.S. Exchange Foundation.  He doubts there will be a full blown financial crisis in China any time soon. "When necessary, the Chinese government will not hesitate to inject capital from the reserves into commercial banks," he wrote.

In the Media